On Thu, 13 Nov 2003, Tim O'Brien wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-11-13 at 13:59, Noel J. Bergman wrote: > > > > You and Martin Cooper both favor Maven. If no one objects, would you > > > > guys be willing to do the work? I'm a not a Maven maven. :-) > > > > > I too would favor Maven and could definately help with the transition. > > > > OK, that's three: Mark, Martin and Brett. Is there any reason to NOT do > > this? If not, I'd suggest that the three of you coordinate efforts, and do > > it. > > Count me on the list, I've done a fair amount of Mavenizing already, but > most of it has been undercover :-) Ditto. Am prepared to put time into achieving a common l&f for Commons. Couple of complaints about Maven: 1) I don't want to have to build every project [ie figure out weird Sun dependencies] just to push up a global site change. I can accept this though. 2) The standard 'project documentation' section gets placed at the bottom when it's the most important information for a specific project. We replicate most of this in other sections. This replication can be a bit odd though, ie) contributors page and the maven generated project team page. Hen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
