On Sat, 14 Aug 2004, Phil Steitz wrote:
> Mark R. Diggory wrote: > > > > After a great deal of discussion, maybe this subject should be voted on > > to bring the subject to completion. Otherwise, it will just get more > > heated. > > We should not have to resort to a vote on this. I suggest that we suspend > this discussion until we get 1.0 out and then we can discuss lists, more > ambitious projects, etc. as part of a post-1.0 roadmap discussion. +1 to delay. Let's have a 1.0, then cover this again. 1.0 is pretty close by the sound of it (?), and any discussion on a new mail list would (should) not affect 1.0's design. If users are turning up and having a greater than usual problem, it would signify that a commons-math-user list is needed. If people offering ideas are having a greater problem (contributors), a commons-math-contributor/discuss might be needed. Hen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
