Re: Steps prior to graduating from Sandbox

[robert burrell donkin]

in theory, all that's required is that a component satisfies the 
requirements to be a commons component and passes a vote. (the sandbox 
is free for people to play in but some sandbox projects should graduate 
to somewhere other than the commons.)

in practice, the question is what the consensus amongst commons 
committers .

willingness and preparedness for an initial release. this does not need 
to be a 1.0, sometimes an API needs time to mature or there are major 
features missing and in those cases a 0.x release might be more 
appropriate. the aim should be to create an initial release immediately 
after promotion.

a healthy community of developers and users, as well as committers.

- robert
On 2 Nov 2004, at 12:11, Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
Unrelated, but do you know what would be the steps for a project to be
graduated from the sandbox?
Oliver
On Tue, 2 Nov 2004 12:34:27 +0100, Eric Pugh
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all,
I started updating the Status.html doc.   I wanted to make sure we 
have a
consensus on steps prior to proposing to graduate from the sandbox:

1) Remove commons-validator.
2) Verify unit tests (dumbster) run on *NIX boxes
3) Documentation enhancements?
Does this look good?
Eric
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]