apologies. sent the wrong email :(
please ignore
- robert
On 2 Nov 2004, at 20:10, robert burrell donkin wrote:
in theory, all that's required is that a component satisfies the
requirements to be a commons component and passes a vote. (the sandbox
is free for people to play in but some sandbox projects should
graduate to somewhere other than the commons.)
in practice, the question is what the consensus amongst commons
committers .
willingness and preparedness for an initial release. this does not
need to be a 1.0, sometimes an API needs time to mature or there are
major features missing and in those cases a 0.x release might be more
appropriate. the aim should be to create an initial release
immediately after promotion.
a healthy community of developers and users, as well as committers.
- robert
On 2 Nov 2004, at 12:11, Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
Unrelated, but do you know what would be the steps for a project to be
graduated from the sandbox?
Oliver
On Tue, 2 Nov 2004 12:34:27 +0100, Eric Pugh
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all,
I started updating the Status.html doc. I wanted to make sure we
have a
consensus on steps prior to proposing to graduate from the sandbox:
1) Remove commons-validator.
2) Verify unit tests (dumbster) run on *NIX boxes
3) Documentation enhancements?
Does this look good?
Eric
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
