Eric Have you got an email or something that doesn't involve the tedious source forge sign up, for the dumpster guy?
I'm trying to get just a smtp session running (no other tests). This is the root of the troubles I've been having. Anyway give me an email and I'll get on the case. Mark On Wed, 3 Nov 2004 10:13:11 +0100, Eric Pugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Maybe I should start another thread, but what do you think of the current > state of [email]. We currently have a high level of unit testing, and it > is building under Gump nicely. We are working on resolving the Ant/Maven > build issues. I'd like to put out a feeler for graduating from sandbox > before calling for a vote. See what else we need. > > My biggest concern is that I am the only active committer. On the other > hand, I don't see that the codebase in [email] can "mature" anymore then it > has already! > > Eric > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: robert burrell donkin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2004 9:11 PM > > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > > Subject: Re: Steps prior to graduating from Sandbox > > > > > > in theory, all that's required is that a component satisfies the > > requirements to be a commons component and passes a vote. (the sandbox > > is free for people to play in but some sandbox projects should graduate > > to somewhere other than the commons.) > > > > in practice, the question is what the consensus amongst commons > > committers . > > > > willingness and preparedness for an initial release. this does not need > > to be a 1.0, sometimes an API needs time to mature or there are major > > features missing and in those cases a 0.x release might be more > > appropriate. the aim should be to create an initial release immediately > > after promotion. > > > > a healthy community of developers and users, as well as committers. > > > > > > > > - robert > > > > On 2 Nov 2004, at 12:11, Oliver Zeigermann wrote: > > > > > Unrelated, but do you know what would be the steps for a project to be > > > graduated from the sandbox? > > > > > > Oliver > > > > > > On Tue, 2 Nov 2004 12:34:27 +0100, Eric Pugh > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> Hi all, > > >> > > >> I started updating the Status.html doc. I wanted to make sure we > > >> have a > > >> consensus on steps prior to proposing to graduate from the sandbox: > > >> > > >> 1) Remove commons-validator. > > >> 2) Verify unit tests (dumbster) run on *NIX boxes > > >> 3) Documentation enhancements? > > >> > > >> Does this look good? > > >> > > >> Eric > > >> > > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >> > > >> > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
