On 9/5/06, Dion Gillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 9/6/06, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
<snip/>
> Phil is correct in pointing out that they be fixed, but IMO, which
> side of 1.1 that happens on is secondary -- as long as it happens.
> Doing it later gives us a clean process now (ideally, no mods between
> voting and a release, and though we have practical considerations, not
> sure we should exercise those in this case). Ofcourse, if I'm the only
> one who thinks that way, please go ahead ;-)
I'm happy for the checkstyle report/config to be fixed post 1.1 release.
I don't see this as showstopper either - as stated above, I am +1 with
release as is and understand Rahu's reservation about changes after RC
tag and vote.
Phil
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
