I also think we have to have different version number since you have
fixed some bugs and update the document so here is my +1 for the version
number.

Ajith Ranabahu wrote:

>Hi,
>Cool, I'm ok with the version number 1.0.1 (and frankly I'm thinking
>that Jeremy has a point and 1.0.1 would be a better number than 1.1)
>
>Ajith
>
>
>On 3/27/06, Jeremy Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  
>
>>I'm interested in the reasoning about using 1.1 for small bugfix
>>release (including extra docs). I think v1.0.1 would be more fitting.
>>IMHO a v2 would likely include very significant new function or maybe
>>even a rearchitecture. v1.1 should contain new function and v1.0.1
>>would include bug fixes, doc updates etc. Users of v1.0 not requiring
>>new function would likely upgrade to v1.0.x quite readily in the
>>knowledge that only bugs have been fixed and no new (potentially
>>disruptive) functional changes have been made. Most projects in my
>>experience do it like this ... eg Axis
>>
>>So I'm +1 for a release. But maybe call it v1.0.1.
>>
>>Thx,
>>Jeremy
>>
>>On 3/27/06, Sanjiva Weerawarana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>    
>>
>>>+1.
>>>
>>>Sanjiva.
>>>
>>>On Sun, 2006-03-26 at 15:07 -0500, Dan Diephouse wrote:
>>>      
>>>
>>>>+1
>>>>
>>>>I am travelling a lot this week, but I can help do the release this
>>>>weekend.
>>>>- Dan
>>>>
>>>>Ajith Ranabahu wrote:
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>>>Hi all,
>>>>>I just commited some documentation (still at the maven 1 structure
>>>>>though) and a patched up build script that generates binary and source
>>>>>distributions for the XMLSchema.
>>>>>Since the last XMLSchema release hardly had any documentation and due
>>>>>to the fixing of several crucial bugs (such as errorneous
>>>>>serialization of the schema in JDK 1.5) I propose
>>>>>we do a commons XMLSchema 1.1 release.
>>>>>
>>>>>here is my +1 for the XMLSchema 1.1 release.
>>>>>--
>>>>>Ajith Ranabahu
>>>>>
>>>>>          
>>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>      
>>>
>
>
>--
>Ajith Ranabahu
>
>  
>


-- 
Thanks,
Deepal
................................................................
~Future is Open~ 

Reply via email to