+1 to RC's. -- dims
On 4/23/06, Eran Chinthaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > > Hope you all know that we are in the process of releasing Axis2 1.0, the > big one :). So we never know we might find another bug or improvement in > schema, policy of axiom. What I propose is to have release candidates of > these, until we release Axis2. > This is what now we do with Axiom and policy. This has advantage of not > having the over head of releasing a proper release. For example, when we > need a new version of schema for the next RC of Axis2, we need to do a > vote, then Dan or some release manager needs to update the docs, change > some discrepancies, etc ., But releasing RCs do not have this cumbersome > procedure and its fast (and hopefully safe too :)) > > If this is approved I can help to release the RCs whilst Dan may > continue to help by releasing proper releases. > > Thanks, > Chinthaka > > > Davanum Srinivas wrote: > > +1 to Tuesday :) > > > > thanks, > > dims > > > > On 4/23/06, Dan Diephouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote: > >> > >>> On Fri, 2006-04-21 at 20:21 +0530, Deepal jayasinghe wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > >>>> Hash: SHA1 > >>>> > >>>> Hi all; > >>>> > >>>> Axis2 has hard dependency on XMLScheam and we are planning to do the > >>>> 1.0 release very soon (1st of May). And its not good idea to do the > >>>> 1.0 release with SNAPSHOT dependencies. It will be great if we can > >>>> have XMLSchema release before 1st of May, > >>>> > >>>> here is my +1 on doing release before above mentioned date. > >>>> > >>>> > >>> +1 .. Dan can you oblige again please? Thanks!! > >>> > >>> Sanjiva. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> +1. I can cut it on Tues I think. Does that work? > >> > >> - Dan > >> > >> -- > >> Dan Diephouse > >> (616) 971-2053 > >> Envoi Solutions LLC > >> http://netzooid.com > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > > Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/ > > > > > > > -- Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
