On 15.09.2010 22:49, Daniel Schwen wrote: > krpano is not an option, it is non-free. > A alternative would be panosalado2, but last time I checked it had > numerous problems, such as
Why being so dogmatic? I agree that free software is a must for core components of our project for strategic reasons. However for secondary components such as an image viewer I see no such strategic reasons. And if somebody programmed a nice piece of code that you can't easily write yourself why not pay for it? At least if the price of 90USD is marginal for an organization like Wikimedia. Regards Robin _______________________________________________ Commons-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l
