On 16 September 2010 11:19, Robin Schwab <[email protected]> wrote:

> Why being so dogmatic? I agree that free software is a must for core
> components of our project for strategic reasons. However for secondary
> components such as an image viewer I see no such strategic reasons.


Because content that requires a proprietary viewer is considered
problematic. This is why Commons requires free formats.


- d.

_______________________________________________
Commons-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l

Reply via email to