On 16.09.2010 13:46, David Gerard wrote: > On 16 September 2010 11:19, Robin Schwab<[email protected]> wrote: >> Why being so dogmatic? I agree that free software is a must for core >> components of our project for strategic reasons. However for secondary >> components such as an image viewer I see no such strategic reasons. > > Because content that requires a proprietary viewer is considered > problematic. This is why Commons requires free formats.
I'm not talking about allowing content in a proprietary file format. All those panoramics are jpg files. I only propose to put a proprietary software on our servers giving the user an alternative way to see those jpg files. Regards Robin _______________________________________________ Commons-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l
