On Wednesday, April 11, 2012 at 12:45 PM, Sarah wrote: > Can anyone point me to the basis of the claim that cc licences are > irrevocable?
http://wiki.creativecommons.org/Frequently_Asked_Questions#What_if_I_change_my_mind.3F On Wednesday, April 11, 2012 at 12:45 PM, Sarah wrote: > If someone were to upload an image to Flickr with a cc > non-commercial licence, then changed her mind and broadened it to > allow commercial use, Commons would not reject the image on the > grounds that the first, more restrictive, licence was irrevocable. Not exactly. The license is irrevocable =/= license is exclusive. We don't *have* to follow the NC license. Say the work was once BY-SA-NC and later changed to BY-SA, people can still create derivative work and license them with BY-SA-NC, *not* BY-SA. (Do correct me if I'm wrong) Best regards, Benjamin Chen / User:Bencmq
_______________________________________________ Commons-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l
