Hoi,
No Fae, your argument is centred around the notion that copyrights exist
even when they do not. The Israeli example is well known in this list and
the Israeli government insists that it claims to copyright.
Your argument fails as copyright is claimed to exist by the insistence on
providing a license when the basic fact of that copyright is denied by the
"owner" of that copyright.. In the case of the Israeli government it is a
law defining body who says so.
Thanks,
GerardM
On 26 June 2014 10:42, Fæ <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 26 June 2014 07:02, Gerard Meijssen <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hoi,
> > The operational word in your mail is "copyright holder". When the party
> or
> > parties who you INSIST have a copyright deny that they do like the
> Israeli
> > government does, your whole argument becomes a puddle.
> > Thanks,
> > GerardM
>
> Gerard,
>
> I have said nothing about the Israeli government, neither has anyone
> else in this thread.
>
> Your chosen wording ("you INSIST") makes it appear like I have said
> something, somewhere, against the Israeli government. Please provide a
> diff or kindly stop trolling by posting chaff like this. You have a
> significant track record over the last two months of making completely
> unnecessary aggressive personal comments about me on Wikimedia-L, and
> now you have followed me to this list. Stop.
>
> Fae
> --
> [email protected] https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Fae
>
> _______________________________________________
> Commons-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l
>
_______________________________________________
Commons-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l
