Hoi,
I heard it the first time and it does not hold water. For me this argument
is in between splitting hairs and sophistry.
Thanks,
GerardM
On 26 June 2014 12:11, geni <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 26 June 2014 07:02, Gerard Meijssen <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hoi,
>> The operational word in your mail is "copyright holder". When the party
>> or parties who you INSIST have a copyright deny that they do like the
>> Israeli government does, your whole argument becomes a puddle.
>> Thanks,
>> GerardM
>>
>>
> The Israeli government has denied no such thing. All it has stated is that
> it doesn't hold the copyrights within Israel. We have no documentation of
> it expressing a position on its overseas copyrights. Is there any part of
> this you don't understand?
>
>
> --
> geni
>
> _______________________________________________
> Commons-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l
>
>
_______________________________________________
Commons-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l
