On Fri, 2004-03-12 at 11:04, David Graham wrote: > --- "John E. Conlon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Mapper looks like a nice solution to debundle mapping implementations > > but are there any implementations using Mapper right now. > > > > I would like to use this even if I have to write wrappers myself, but I > > don't want to re-invent the wheel. > > Each implementation of the Mapper interface will typically persist one > kind of business object. Ah I think I see said the blind man.
> Obviously this is specific to your app. so I > don't know what you mean by your question. > >From the introduction: The purpose of Mapper is similar to Commons Logging. It isn't a mapping technology itself, it merely exposes common functionality of other mapping APIs. I was expecting there may be mapper wrappers for some of the persistent technologies out there... What else do you have planned for the Mapper project besides documentation? thanks, John --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
