--- "John E. Conlon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 2004-03-12 at 15:50, David Graham wrote: > > --- "John E. Conlon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Fri, 2004-03-12 at 11:04, David Graham wrote: > > > > --- "John E. Conlon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Mapper looks like a nice solution to debundle mapping > > > implementations > > > > > but are there any implementations using Mapper right now. > > > > > > > > > > I would like to use this even if I have to write wrappers > myself, > > > but I > > > > > don't want to re-invent the wheel. > > > > > > > > Each implementation of the Mapper interface will typically persist > one > > > > kind of business object. > > > Ah I think I see said the blind man. > > > > > > > Obviously this is specific to your app. so I > > > > don't know what you mean by your question. > > > > > > > > > > >From the introduction: > > > > > > The purpose of Mapper is similar to Commons Logging. It isn't a > mapping > > > technology itself, it merely exposes common functionality of other > > > mapping APIs. > > > > > > I was expecting there may be mapper wrappers for some of the > persistent > > > technologies out there... > > > > Mapper used to contain JDBC helper code but that was removed when > DbUtils > > was released. > > I was debating the merits of DbUtils vs Commons SQL and chose to > continue to work with the SQL. (But I would reconsider if I saw more > community momentum). Are there any examples of DbUtils and mapper > integration?
DbUtils and SQL have different goals. SQL is still in the sandbox while DbUtils has made an official 1.0 release and is working towards 1.1. My projects use both Mapper and DbUtils for persistence. I've recently started using Hibernate as well so I'm considering some changes to Mapper. Mapper literally saved one project when the database design changed at the last minute. All I had to do was change the Mapper implementation classes and the rest of the system remained unchanged :-). David > > > > > What else do you have planned for the Mapper project besides > > > documentation? > > > > Much of the most useful code has migrated to other projects (ie. > DbUtils) > > and what remains is a small layer above mapping technologies. I've > been > > considering changes to the Mapper interface and exception handling but > > Mapper needs a bigger community before it can be released to commons > > proper. Feel free to contribute code/ideas! > > > > David > > > > > > > > thanks, > > > John > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > __________________________________ > > Do you Yahoo!? > > Yahoo! Search - Find what youÂ’re looking for faster > > http://search.yahoo.com > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - More reliable, more storage, less spam http://mail.yahoo.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
