--- "John E. Conlon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 2004-03-12 at 11:04, David Graham wrote: > > --- "John E. Conlon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Mapper looks like a nice solution to debundle mapping > implementations > > > but are there any implementations using Mapper right now. > > > > > > I would like to use this even if I have to write wrappers myself, > but I > > > don't want to re-invent the wheel. > > > > Each implementation of the Mapper interface will typically persist one > > kind of business object. > Ah I think I see said the blind man. > > > Obviously this is specific to your app. so I > > don't know what you mean by your question. > > > > >From the introduction: > > The purpose of Mapper is similar to Commons Logging. It isn't a mapping > technology itself, it merely exposes common functionality of other > mapping APIs. > > I was expecting there may be mapper wrappers for some of the persistent > technologies out there...
Mapper used to contain JDBC helper code but that was removed when DbUtils was released. > > What else do you have planned for the Mapper project besides > documentation? Much of the most useful code has migrated to other projects (ie. DbUtils) and what remains is a small layer above mapping technologies. I've been considering changes to the Mapper interface and exception handling but Mapper needs a bigger community before it can be released to commons proper. Feel free to contribute code/ideas! David > > thanks, > John > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Search - Find what you�re looking for faster http://search.yahoo.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
