> On 29 Sep 2016, at 22:48, Andrew Alston <andrew.als...@liquidtelecom.com> 
> wrote:
> The problem here and this is where it gets murky, by precedent and by what 
> has always been communicated to the members, we effectively treat the members 
> as shareholders. There are numerous instances where this has been stated both 
> on the floor at AGMM’s and in emails.  I would need to find specific 
> examples, but I believe such has even been stated by council.

I have always tried to be clear on the difference.  What the Act calls 
“Members” or “Shareholders” corresponds, in my view, to what AFRINIC calls 
“Registered Members”.

We do treat Resource Members a lot like shareholders, in many ways that are 
listed in the Bylaws (mostly in section 7.6), but in cases where the Act gives 
some rights or responsibilities to shareholders or members, and the Bylaws are 
silent on the issue, then I believe that only Registered Members are affected 
by the Act.

> Now – this may or may not hold legal ground – I am no lawyer and don’t claim 
> to be – but perhaps this opens a wider question – do we consider members to 
> have the same rights as shareholders under the act.  If so, we should 
> probably enshrine this in the bylaws – if not – we should probably have 
> something that clearly delineates the differences.

I am also not a lawyer.  I worry about unintended consequences of explicitly 
giving Resource Members all the powers of shareholders, and would want 
carefully considered legal advice before we do anything like that.

> Again – if members are considered in terms of the bylaws as shareholders – 
> the proxy limitation becomes invalid under that interpretation.

I see some support for removing the proxy limitation.

> If we do not consider them as such in terms of the bylaws – it creates 
> another problem – there are various parts of the companies that are very 
> explicit in the rights that are assigned *only* to shareholders – and at that 
> point we have to be consistent in our approach.  We can’t pick and choose 
> here.

My belief is that we have been consistent: the rights assigned by the Act to 
shareholders apply only to Registered Members, unless the Bylaws also assign 
those rights to other categories of members.

Alan Barrett





_______________________________________________
Community-Discuss mailing list
Community-Discuss@afrinic.net
https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss

Reply via email to