On 28 October 2016 at 18:25, Andrew Alston <[email protected]> wrote:
> And while you sit and advocate for preservation of IPv4 space, will you > lead by example and return the 75% of space your own organisation has had > for 6 years and has never announced? > > > > I can provide the prefix if you like, and the BGP Play data to back it up. > > > > Or are you advocating its ok to stop others getting space to preserve it > while you yourself sit on space that is in clear and total violation of the > Ipv4 allocation policies? > > > No I am not advocating that. I find your new interest in adhering to policies encouraging. Why stop at my word or interpretation of incomplete information you don't understand? I will submit to a review of any allocations related to me by AFRINIC at any time. I have expressed emphatic support of the Internet Number Resources Audit policy proposal which also covers IPv6 and ASNs - http://www.afrinic.net/ community/policy-development/policy-proposals/1827- internet-number-resources-review-by-afrinic I recall that you were the first to object on grounds that resemble your current line of inquiry. > > I will strongly oppose this policy – it is impractical, unenforceable and > hugely open to abuse. Organisation X doesn’t like Organisation Y, > Organisation X goes to AfriNIC and goes “omg I think someone is not using > their space properly”, Organisation Y is now under audit and wasting > valuable time and effort when its entirely possible their space usage is > entirely legitimate. - https://lists.afrinic.net/ > pipermail/rpd/2016/005466.html Are you now able to see that the proposal is useful and why we should all support in passing it through quickly? -- Omo Oaiya CTO/Directeur Technique, WACREN Mobile: +234 808 888 1571 , +221 784 305 224 Skype: kodion http://www.wacren.net
_______________________________________________ Community-Discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss
