Hello Arnaud, Even though I think the current PDP allows the Co-Chairs to vary the process incase such emergency occurs, It's fine to update the PDP to define such a clear process similar to what you referenced.
Regards Sent from my LG G4 Kindly excuse brevity and typos On 12 Nov 2016 13:13, "Arnaud AMELINA" <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello, > Ì can see under this link https://www.arin.net/policy/pdp.html > > Special Policy Actions > > 10.1 Emergency PDP > > If urgently necessary pursuant to ARIN’s mission, the Board of Trustees > may initiate policy by declaring an emergency and posting a Recommended > Draft Policy on the PPML for discussion for a minimum of 14 days. The > Advisory Council will review the Recommended Draft Policy within 7 days of > the end of the discussion period and make a recommendation to the Board of > Trustees. If the Board of Trustees adopts the policy, it will be presented > at the next Public Policy Meeting for reconsideration > > Arin has this in its pdp.Anything to learn from for this discussion? > > Le 12 nov. 2016 11:11, "Alan Barrett" <[email protected]> a écrit : > >> >> > On 12 Nov 2016, at 14:52, Christian Bope <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > [Speaking on my own capacity.] >> > >> > As stated in my previous post related to item 13. >> > There are 2 key element we should all keep in mind and maintain. >> > 1. PDP guidelines shall be updated to describe how Board can adopt a >> policy. >> > 2. Board adopted policy must be ratified by the community. If not it is >> rejected. >> >> I’d say PDP guidelines should be updated to say how the community >> ratifies or rejects Board-adopted policy. >> >> On your point 2, yes, the proposed changes to Article 11.5 will give the >> community the power to reject Board-adopted policy. Here’s the current >> version of the text: >> >> 11.5 Endorsement of policy adopted by the Board: >> (i) Any policy adopted by the Board under the provisions of Article 11.4 >> shall be submitted to the community for endorsement at the next public >> policy meeting. >> (ii) In the event that such a policy submitted by the Board is not >> endorsed, the said policy shall not be enforced or implemented following >> its non-endorsement; however, any actions taken in terms of the policy >> prior to such non-endorsement shall remain valid. >> >> Sub-part (i) is the existing text. Sub-part (ii) is new, and makes it >> clear that rejection by the community leads to the policy being cancelled. >> >> >> Alan Barrett >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Community-Discuss mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss >> > > _______________________________________________ > Community-Discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss > >
_______________________________________________ Community-Discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss
