On Thu, 17 May 2018, 12:15 p.m. Mark Elkins, <m...@posix.co.za> wrote:
> I disagree with your first paragraph. I was a Board Member when "None of
> the Above" was introduced. I was also often on NomCom. The simple idea
> behind "None of the Above" is simply that - None of the above - that's
> everyone (natural persons) listed on that ballot. It's not just for the
> case where there is only one name on the ballot.
I acknowledge your experience but for this one, I beg to differ because the
text in the bylaws is very crystal clear.
This is a mistake imho and more clarification is sought as we cant deny a
candidate the win based on precidence yet the rules say otherwise.
May we get the opinion of legal as his clarification is important.
Community-Discuss mailing list