Dear AfriNIC's Community, Hope this email finds you in good health!
Le ven. 2 juil. 2021 12:43 PM, Owen DeLong via Community-Discuss < [email protected]> a écrit : > > Hi Owen, Thanks for your email, brother! > > [...] > > Assuming that even in the simple case of a single organization, it does > meet the test, then one has to consider the following easy derivatives: > > ...interesting! > An organization which happens to have a wholly owned subsidiary > that is a broker > Questions: ~°~ •1] Would that org be bound to the RSA? •2] Would it be compliant to the CPM? ~°~ An organization which isn’t a broker, but happens to be the wholly > owned subsidiary of a broker > ...same questions, here, as above :-/ Given that it's about registration of service, remember RSA section 4. Conditions of service... ...particularly: b) Cooperation: c) Applicant's use of the service An organization which is owned by an entity which also owns such a > broker > etc. > > > Remember: AfriNIC has the right to review the use of the service offered to the resource members. > For any “clear, objective, and transparent” version of such a prohibition, > I’m pretty sure it’s relatively trivial to design a structure that is just > grey enough to become “shaded, subjective, and translucent at best”. > > ...imho, it just adds more work to AfriNIC's Staff, to protect the regional pools of INRs against "non-acceptable" uses... being it out-of-region or not. Also there is a way to report on non- compliant behaviours...so AfriNIC's Staff could benefit of a community collaboration. Shalom, --sb. > Owen > > [...]
_______________________________________________ Community-Discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss
