> On Jul 15, 2021, at 13:33 , Ronald F. Guilmette <[email protected]> > wrote: > > In message <[email protected]>, > Owen DeLong <[email protected]> wrote: > >> The "sub judice" rule was temporarily not in effect >> while the case was dismissed >> until such time as the appeal was accepted. This created a window during >> which we could disclose certain factual information. >> >> The "sub judice" rule only applies while there is an >> active case that is actually "sub judice" (which means >> "under the consideration of the court" basically). >> When AFRINIC succeeded in getting the case dismissed, it stopped being >> "sub judice" until such time as the judge ruled to >> reinstate the injunction pending >> the appeal. > > That's a very interesting legal theory Owen. > > May I quote you?
That was my understanding from what the lawyers said to us. If I’m wrong, I guess I’ll have to apologize to the Mauritian courts. Owen _______________________________________________ Community-Discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss
