In message <[email protected]>, Owen DeLong <[email protected]> wrote:
>The "sub judice" rule was temporarily not in effect >while the case was dismissed >until such time as the appeal was accepted. This created a window during >which we could disclose certain factual information. > >The "sub judice" rule only applies while there is an >active case that is actually "sub judice" (which means >"under the consideration of the court" basically). >When AFRINIC succeeded in getting the case dismissed, it stopped being >"sub judice" until such time as the judge ruled to >reinstate the injunction pending >the appeal. That's a very interesting legal theory Owen. May I quote you? Regards, rfg _______________________________________________ Community-Discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss
