> On Jul 14, 2021, at 16:58 , Ronald F. Guilmette <[email protected]> > wrote: > > In message > <cad4w+im-88h+fn+qpdd67kg9+dsifl_h-jbp9hcu-d4k8r1...@mail.gmail.com> > DANIEL NANGHAKA <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I would like to appreciate the level of transparency that is being put >> forward here by Cloud Innovation. > > I also appreciate the additional information, even as I marvel at the > apparent fact that although Cloud Innovation is currently still engaged > in litigation before the Supreme Court of Mauritius, the so-called > "sub judice" rule apparently does not apply to either it or this case.
The “sub judice” rule was temporarily not in effect while the case was dismissed until such time as the appeal was accepted. This created a window during which we could disclose certain factual information. The “sub judice” rule only applies while there is an active case that is actually “sub judice” (which means “under the consideration of the court” basically). When AFRINIC succeeded in getting the case dismissed, it stopped being “sub judice” until such time as the judge ruled to reinstate the injunction pending the appeal. Owen _______________________________________________ Community-Discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss
