Yep ... I just saw your email.

I don't know why (asked staff several times), I always get the emails from 
AFRINIC lists 10-15 minutes late (even my own emails). I'm sure is not my 
server, as it doesn't happen to me with several hundreds of other lists from 
IETF, ISOC, and all the other RIRs, to mention just a few!

El 27/7/21 21:43, "Frank Habicht" <[email protected]> escribió:

    Hi Jordi,

    On 27/07/2021 22:30, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via Community-Discuss wrote:
    > This will be very simple to resolve (not taking a position in one side or 
the other because I don't have all the real facts and documents).
    > 
    > The original justificacion of the request of the resources I don't think 
it had so many "secret" and "confidential" details. After several years if any 
"secrets" were there, probably aren't longer something that can't published now.
    > 
    > So why not CI, voluntarely publish that information? I don't have any 
stance on this game, but if I was CI, this will be the best way to probe my 
points.

    it seems 4 minutes earlier I suggested same to Owen.

    > Otherwise, I will suggest that AFRINIC asks the court to incorporate that 
in the proceedings if is not there already, this way, whatever is the result of 
the case, everybody will know it. At least in the countries I know, the results 
of the cases are public, as well as the documents that were incorporated during 
all the process: transparency.

    I don't know whether or not (under the Mauritius legal system) the
    information/documents will become public.
    I certainly would like to have AfriNIC ask the courts to consider them.
    I was hoping that was clear from my previous emails.


    Frank



    > 
    > Regards,
    > Jordi
    > @jordipalet
    >  
    >  
    > 
    > El 27/7/21 21:12, "Frank Habicht" <[email protected]> escribió:
    > 
    >     Hi Owen,
    > 
    >     On 27/07/2021 19:09, Owen DeLong wrote:
    >     >> On Jul 27, 2021, at 00:26 , Frank Habicht <[email protected]> 
wrote:
    >     >>> It also serves more end users than the population of all of those
    >     >>> countries combined. What is your point?
    >     >>
    >     >> "serves" ...?
    >     > Yes.>> with connectivity?
    >     > 
    >     > In some cases.
    > 
    >     I'll just mentally insert the word "few" in there, because i haven't
    >     seen any yet.
    > 
    > 
    >     >> Or by "buying" IPv4 addresses one place and "selling"/leasing them
    >     >> another place.
    >     > 
    >     > By providing a variety of services, some of which include IP 
address management
    >     > independent of connectivity.
    > 
    >     "variety of services"
    >     So my first thought was to press <shift> and the key between v and n
    >     and then <shift> and the key between a and d
    > 
    >     gosh, at the risk of getting my hand slapped, just to make sure i'm
    >     understood : BS - bullshit!
    > 
    > 
    >     "IP address management"
    >     putting something into AfriNIC's Whois / IRR ?
    >     reverse DNS delegations?
    >      [ probably only at extra cost (wild guess) ]
    >     Using AfriNIC's auth DNS servers, by just updating domain: objects?
    > 
    > 
    >     >> this is to me closer to speculation than the stated intention of
    >     >>
    >     >> 1. the resource we take are using in africa.
    >     >> 2. we are investing in africa.
    >     > 
    >     > We are definitely investing in Africa. That statement remains true.
    > 
    >     No doubt.
    >     Lawyers in Mauritius.
    > 
    > 
    >     > Regarding the former statement, things do change over time.
    > 
    >     Agree.
    >     Also validity of justifications of IPv4 space.
    >     I maintain this:
    >     - I have no idea how it was justified.
    >     - I have no right to see this justification.
    >     - I consider it likely that commitments have been made.
    >     - I consider it likely that not all were - and still are - fulfilled.
    > 
    >     > At the time the statement was made, it was true.
    > 
    >     I do currently believe that.
    > 
    >     > Today, the statement “many of the resources we received from 
AFRINIC are being used in Africa” would be more accurate.
    > 
    >     I'm still not too sure about my English knowledge. Especially about
    >     "many". I generally encourage people to be as specific as possible.
    >     Can I interpret this as "more than three IPv4 addresses we received 
from
    >     AFRINIC are being used in Africa” ?
    > 
    > 
    >     >> which is a quote from
    >     >> https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/2014/004161.html
    >     > 
    >     > Yes… It’s a 7 year old statement which was true at the time.
    > 
    >     And I believe so was the justification for IPv4 addresses - at the 
time.
    >     Currently, I believe that. That back then the justification was ok.
    > 
    > 
    >     >> and which I understand was good reason to receive IPv4 addresses.
    >     >> *was*
    >     >> when it was true.
    >     > 
    >     > And today, a good reason to keep the addresses is:
    >     > We use the addresses to number internet connected hosts on our own 
and our customers networks.
    > 
    >     "own network" ?
    >     I believe that in your home area it would be a very valid question to
    >     ask: "which AS is that?" (ie on nanog)
    > 
    >     "customers networks."
    >     "customer" certainly not in terms of connectivity.
    >     [ to be specific: for 99% of traffic towards these IPs [1], I hazard 
the
    >       guess that it doesn't pass through CI connectivity.]
    > 
    >     but "customer" instead only in terms of leasing IP addresses.
    >     which you (CI) got the right to do when getting them from AfriNIC in 
the
    >     first place??? I beg to doubt!!!
    > 
    >     And I think this is what it's all about. CI interpretation vs AfriNIC
    >     interpretation. And I think that latter is shared with a majority of 
the
    >     community.
    > 
    >     > This is a perfectly valid justification for addresses and there is 
no basis in current policy to deny it and
    >     > it remains a true statement to this day.
    > 
    >     If
    >     it was a perfectly valid justification to provide addresses to CI's
    >     "customers" - without the "customers" receiving (for all the duration 
of
    >     the lease) any services but the lease of IPv4 addresses (not counting
    >     BS-"IP address management"), and with that fact (of leasing) being
    >     stated in said justification - and this accepted as justification at 
the
    >     time by AfriNIC,
    >     then
    >     I rest my case.
    > 
    > 
    >     Frank
    > 
    >     PS: sorry for the long sentence, it seems my mind turned "legal".
    > 
    >     [1]
    >     "these IPs":
    >     2x /11 and 2x /12
    > 
    >     _______________________________________________
    >     Community-Discuss mailing list
    >     [email protected]
    >     https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss
    > 
    > 
    > 
    > **********************************************
    > IPv4 is over
    > Are you ready for the new Internet ?
    > http://www.theipv6company.com
    > The IPv6 Company
    > 
    > This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or 
confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the 
individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, 
copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if 
partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be 
considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware 
that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this 
information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly 
prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the 
original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.
    > 
    > 
    > 
    > 
    > _______________________________________________
    > Community-Discuss mailing list
    > [email protected]
    > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss
    > 

    _______________________________________________
    Community-Discuss mailing list
    [email protected]
    https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss



**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.theipv6company.com
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or 
confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the 
individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, 
copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if 
partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be 
considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware 
that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this 
information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly 
prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the 
original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.




_______________________________________________
Community-Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss

Reply via email to