> On Jul 27, 2021, at 12:30 , JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via Community-Discuss > <[email protected]> wrote: > > This will be very simple to resolve (not taking a position in one side or the > other because I don't have all the real facts and documents). > > The original justificacion of the request of the resources I don't think it > had so many "secret" and "confidential" details. After several years if any > "secrets" were there, probably aren't longer something that can't published > now.
We have already agreed that the original justification is no longer relevant and that, like any ISP in business for more than 8 years, things have changed and we have adapted. > So why not CI, voluntarely publish that information? I don't have any stance > on this game, but if I was CI, this will be the best way to probe my points. Because it is no longer relevant. > Otherwise, I will suggest that AFRINIC asks the court to incorporate that in > the proceedings if is not there already, this way, whatever is the result of > the case, everybody will know it. At least in the countries I know, the > results of the cases are public, as well as the documents that were > incorporated during all the process: transparency. In reality, even if a curative submission is required (if the last filed justification to which I do not have access, TBH), I would suggest they simply modify their justification to the following: We will use the addresses to number internet connected hosts on our own infrastructure and on our customers’ networks. This is a justification which meets the letter of the law of the policy and which does not preclude leasing. Owen _______________________________________________ Community-Discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss
