Dear AfriNIC's Community, Please see my comments below, inline...
Le mercredi 28 juillet 2021, Owen DeLong via Community-Discuss < [email protected]> a écrit : > > > > On Jul 27, 2021, at 12:30 , JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via Community-Discuss < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > This will be very simple to resolve (not taking a position in one side > or the other because I don't have all the real facts and documents). > > > > The original justificacion of the request of the resources I don't think > it had so many "secret" and "confidential" details. After several years if > any "secrets" were there, probably aren't longer something that can't > published now. > > How come that INRs management becomes a matter of such secrets? Please Jordi or any other volunteer, let me know if you are willing to contribute to draft a DPP to remove the possibility of keeping such, apparently, unjustified secrets. > We have already agreed that the original justification is no longer > relevant and that, like any ISP in business for more than 8 years, things > have changed and we have adapted. > > Dear Owen, ...strange! is/was it an adaptation for the good of the AfriNIC's service region? Please, could you enlightenned us on those interesting details? ...moving 90% of INRs out of the AfriNIC's service region, without any Inter RIR transfer policy, seems to be your best way to support the grow of this RIR region. > > So why not CI, voluntarely publish that information? I don't have any > stance on this game, but if I was CI, this will be the best way to probe my > points. > > Because it is no longer relevant. > > > Otherwise, I will suggest that AFRINIC asks the court to incorporate > that in the proceedings if is not there already, this way, whatever is the > result of the case, everybody will know it. At least in the countries I > know, the results of the cases are public, as well as the documents that > were incorporated during all the process: transparency. > > Jordi, maybe it's simply time to stop allowing such secrets. In reality, even if a curative submission is required (if the last filed > justification to which I do not have access, TBH), I would suggest they > simply modify their justification to the following: > > We will use the addresses to number internet connected hosts on our own > infrastructure and on our customers’ networks. > > This is a justification which meets the letter of the law of the policy > and which does not preclude leasing. Owen, ...are you considering the notions of *conservation* and *reservations*? Knowing the understanding of the current implementers of the CPM, it's clear that one shall need to submit a convincing addressing plan before receiving any INR allocation. Shalom, --sb. > > Owen > [...] -- -- Best Regards ! __ baya.sylvain[AT cmNOG DOT cm]|<https://cmnog.cm/dokuwiki/Structure> Subscribe to Mailing List: <https://lists.cmnog.cm/mailman/listinfo/cmnog/> __ #LASAINTEBIBLE|#Romains15:33«Que LE #DIEU de #Paix soit avec vous tous! #Amen!» #MaPrière est que tu naisses de nouveau. #Chrétiennement «Comme une biche soupire après des courants d’eau, ainsi mon âme soupire après TOI, ô DIEU!»(#Psaumes42:2)
_______________________________________________ Community-Discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss
