Le mar. 3 août 2021 à 23:09, Ronald F. Guilmette <[email protected]> a écrit :
> In message < > cagdmr_cl96mmufnsdq8k2pssdrsyw1jiz_k2nshisybe7s5...@mail.gmail.com> > Arnaud AMELINA <[email protected]> wrote: > > >As I said before, history knows who were in the place when all resources > >were provided to CI. After some research, we can summarize as follows: > > > >Adiel was not the ceo who allocated all the numbers and we can see how the > >allocations went 1st /12 2nd /12 and then the 1st /11 and 2nd /11 and all > >this happened within a 12 months time frame! > > I'm sorry, but your information is just not accurate. The version history > of each block provides the correct information about the original > allocation dates, and it is as follows: > > 2013-07-24 -- 154.80.0.0/12 > 2014-12-01 -- 45.192.0.0/12 > 2015-12-22 -- 156.224.0.0/11 > 2016-09-23 -- 154.192.0.0/11 > > Do you disagree with this timeline? If so, on what basis? > No you're right on this one, thanks for the correction, apologize fort the mistake. > Th names of board members or board chairmen on these dates is perfectly > irrelevant because the board never reviewed any of these allocations, > or any of the documents or other materials that were used to justify them. > The allocations were all made as a result of "staff" decisions, not the > board. > You can't be totally sure on this one, because it was the period we saw the Board playing the CEO Prerogatives, and entering in the micromanagement of AFRINIC, remember. > The first two of these allocations were granted under CEO Akplogan, who > did not leave his CEO position until January 31, 2015: > > https://afrinic.net/20140917-ceo-adiel-akplogan-resign I'm OK with this one too, but he already resigned before the allocation, isn't it? > > The two later allocations were granted under CEO Barrett. > If do so, how come New CEO gave 2 of /11 in such a short time? > > ALL of the allocations were made during a time period when Ernest > Byaruhanga > was a high-ranking officer of AFRINIC. > You're right on this one too. > > > In my opinion, -all- of these allocations are suspect, and they are made > moreso because neither Lu Heng nor his apparent primary spokesman here, > Owen DeLong, has seen fit to share with any of us any of the materials or > documentation that was used to provide the required justifications for > any of these allocations -originally- even though it is 100% clear that > all such records, dating back nearly five years ago to over eight years > ago, are no longer in any sense relevant to Cloud Innovation's -current- > business model or business operations. > > The time for dark secrets is over. Lu Heng has elected to try his case > on the mailing lists and in the press. OK. Fine. Then let's do that. > > The question of whether or not Lu Heng's -current- usage of his IP space > does or does not meet acceptable criteria is irrelevant if his -original- > justifications for the space were in any way inadequate or less than > truthful. So let's see those original justifications and let the people > decide whether or not Lu Heng even deserved to be granted this much IPv4 > space in the first place. > > Only Lu Heng can give us those original justification documents, if he so > chooses. AFRINIC is still bound by confidentiality rules and thus cannot > legally provide them to any party outside of AFRINIC. > > > Regards, > rfg > > _______________________________________________ > Community-Discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss >
_______________________________________________ Community-Discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss
