+1 Sylvain!
On Sat, Jul 31, 2021 at 12:48 AM Sylvain Baya <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear AfriNIC's Community, > > Please see my comments below, inline... > > Le mercredi 28 juillet 2021, Owen DeLong via Community-Discuss < > [email protected]> a écrit : > >> >> >> > On Jul 27, 2021, at 12:30 , JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via Community-Discuss < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > This will be very simple to resolve (not taking a position in one side >> or the other because I don't have all the real facts and documents). >> > >> > The original justificacion of the request of the resources I don't >> think it had so many "secret" and "confidential" details. After several >> years if any "secrets" were there, probably aren't longer something that >> can't published now. >> >> > How come that INRs management becomes a > matter of such secrets? > > Please Jordi or any other volunteer, let me know if > you are willing to contribute to draft a DPP to > remove the possibility of keeping such, apparently, > unjustified secrets. > I'm willing to contribute! > > > >> We have already agreed that the original justification is no longer >> relevant and that, like any ISP in business for more than 8 years, things >> have changed and we have adapted. >> >> > Dear Owen, > > ...strange! is/was it an adaptation for the good of > the AfriNIC's service region? > > Please, could you enlightenned us on those > interesting details? > > ...moving 90% of INRs out of the AfriNIC's service > region, without any Inter RIR transfer policy, seems > to be your best way to support the grow of this RIR > region. > > > >> > So why not CI, voluntarely publish that information? I don't have any >> stance on this game, but if I was CI, this will be the best way to probe my >> points. >> >> Because it is no longer relevant. >> >> > Otherwise, I will suggest that AFRINIC asks the court to incorporate >> that in the proceedings if is not there already, this way, whatever is the >> result of the case, everybody will know it. At least in the countries I >> know, the results of the cases are public, as well as the documents that >> were incorporated during all the process: transparency. >> >> > Jordi, maybe it's simply time to stop allowing such > secrets. > > > In reality, even if a curative submission is required (if the last filed >> justification to which I do not have access, TBH), I would suggest they >> simply modify their justification to the following: >> >> We will use the addresses to number internet connected hosts on our own >> infrastructure and on our customers’ networks. >> >> This is a justification which meets the letter of the law of the policy >> and which does not preclude leasing. > > > > Owen, > ...are you considering the notions of *conservation* > and *reservations*? > > Knowing the understanding of the current > implementers of the CPM, it's clear that one shall > need to submit a convincing addressing plan > before receiving any INR allocation. > > Shalom, > --sb. > > >> >> Owen >> [...] > > > > -- > -- > > Best Regards ! > __ > baya.sylvain[AT cmNOG DOT cm]|<https://cmnog.cm/dokuwiki/Structure> > Subscribe to Mailing List: <https://lists.cmnog.cm/mailman/listinfo/cmnog/ > > > __ > #LASAINTEBIBLE|#Romains15:33«Que LE #DIEU de #Paix soit avec > vous tous! #Amen!» > #MaPrière est que tu naisses de nouveau. #Chrétiennement > «Comme une biche soupire après des courants d’eau, ainsi mon âme soupire > après TOI, ô DIEU!»(#Psaumes42:2) > > _______________________________________________ > Community-Discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss Best regards, <.ta/>
_______________________________________________ Community-Discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss
