Ronald F. Guilmette,
I’ll admit I had difficulty reading your response because it consisted of so
many logical fallacies. The community discussion board is only as useful as
it’s discussions, obviously, and the composition of your response fails to meet
that end. 1: You straw man Paul’s argument by taking up a cause no one was
discussing. Global capitalism? Paul is raising the issue of a global internet
for all so please spare us your 2: disastrous appeal to emotion by introducing
a theoretical Kenyan sharecropper’s hardships. If anything, Paul’s proposal
carries the implication that the internet is the very tool to relieve the
economic toil you brought up. 3: Once again, you skew Paul’s argument to fit
your own. From Paul-
“The membership
simply do not know how many litigants there are knocking at Afrinic… but it is
quite clear that there are several cases that need to be handled appropriately
and to date the organization has crafted an environment favouring a litigious
approach.”
It would be helpful if you included the full quote. In essence, you’ve
validated his argument. Litigants are approaching because of the opportunity
the environment that which AFRINIC has facilitated-through its own action-for
litigious action from organizations.
I have seen your prior posts and it is clear you are at the end of your
patience. Your sarcasm/trolling is prevalent and can be easily reported in
violation of the CoC. For the sake of us all the community, please offer valid
counter arguments.
-Brian
_______________________________________________
Community-Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss
