On 6 Aug 2021, at 6:05 AM, John Curran 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

On 5 Aug 2021, at 6:04 PM, Owen DeLong via Community-Discuss 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
...
ALL LIRs lease INRs. Many do it in relation to also providing
connectivity services. Cloud Innovation also does it in relation
to providing connectivity services in some (but not all) cases.

... We (Cloud Innovation) have customers just like any other LIR.
We (Cloud Innovation) assign addresses to them for use on internet
connected hosts, just like any other LIR. The only distinction between
us (Cloud Innovation) and most other LIRs is that we will do so regardless
of whether we are the provider of that connectivity or not.

Owen -

Thanks for the above – I believe it is helpful in clarifying how the IP address 
blocks are being used today.  For my understanding, is this same purpose for 
which they were originally requested and issued?

Owen -

You have posted dozens of messages to this list of rationale asserting Cloud 
Innovation’s legitimacy in number resource matters, even going so face as 
observing that they are "a model citizen of the IP number resource using 
community” and a party with “meticulous” record keeping.  You have also taken 
to responding to many messages on this list detailing their IP number resource 
utilization as proper, and have no issue identifying as “We (Cloud Innovation)” 
in those responses.

Surely you could do the AFRINIC community the courtesy of an answer to a single 
question about their number resource utilization – i.e. a yes/no question of 
fact regarding the number resources that Cloud Innovation obtained from AFRINIC 
and that now appear subject to dispute with AFRINIC?    (While I am sure that 
many have found your many assertions enlightening, it is often helpful to have 
clear statements of fact in order keep discussions well-informed and anchored 
to reality.)

Again, for clarity – “Is Cloud Innovation’s usage today of the number resources 
for the same purpose for which they were originally requested and issued?”  
This simple question is certainly something that the community has a reasonable 
right to know – and should be trivial to answer given your exhaustive knowledge 
demonstrated in correspondence already on the matter.

Thanks in advance!
/John

John Curran
President and CEO
American Registry for Internet Numbers



_______________________________________________
Community-Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss

Reply via email to