On Fri, 31 Jan 2003, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> I agree. But the message, as posted, didn't deal with improper content. Correct. Though I can *well* understand PMC's which clearly keep the message within their own Scope. As that gives a very fair and clear policing guideline. > The issue it raised was simply about oversight from a corporate liability > perspective, essentially guarding against illegal behavior, and that is what > I responded to in my reply. I mentioned my observation that it was a > relatively weak standard for oversight. If more oversight is necessary, a > different set of issues comes up. Dw --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
