> the ASF as a US organisation should have resonable and
> demonstratable oversight over its publicly visible site.
If Wiki vandalism becomes an issue, I have a two part proposal, each part
being independent of the other:
1. Require end users to register, just as they have to
register for a mailing list. The registration process
would e-mail a unique SSL cert to install into a browser.
With that SSL cert in place, users can edit the Wiki.
Without it, they are read-only.
2. Per-PMC Wiki. With per-PMC Wiki in place, all Wiki updates
are posted to a reasonable list, e.g. mail would go to the
same list as cvs changes to the related site.
This should harmonize with earlier discussion on the infrastructure list.
Thoughts?
--- Noel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
