At 03:04 PM 11/19/2004, Brian Behlendorf wrote: >This may be completely inappropriate for this list... but this, is so, >*wrong*. And no matter what side of the political spectrum you sit on, I know >transparency and auditability and trust is important to you - that's why >you're here at Apache. And yes, this is news; not a rehash of what you heard >second-hand was debunked, or whatever. > >http://www.commondreams.org/views04/1118-22.htm
All very sensational - lots of 'evidence', but I'm waiting for major media to pick up on it... http://slate.msn.com/id/2109141/ http://archive.salon.com/tech/feature/2004/11/12/hysteria/index_np.html http://www.miami.com/mld/miamiherald/news/columnists/fred_grimm/10137159.htm?1c http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A41106-2004Nov10.html Not much there yet. If it can be proven, a Pulitzer story for one media outlet or another. The only problem, of course, is the lack of audit and accountability. The only result (if proved true) is the complete loss of faith in any form of electronic voting by the general public for at least the next 20 years. Vote fraud occurred. Not an opinion, but a historical trend dating from the outset of democratic elections. The goal has to be deter and minimize. In the end, the electoral college decides, so if there was enough fraud to tip the balance, someone better provide plausible and complete documentation to the electoral college soon :) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
