On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 6:03 PM, Rod Whitby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Marco Trevisan (Treviño) wrote: >> >> Well, I much appreciate your work and your openness with community, >> unfortunately I can't say the same about Openmoko in this occasion since >> this should be an Open company and so I'd have appreciated it more if the >> decision would have been debated before with developers and active part of >> community (= people writing code) in public lists. > > I guess the question is whether Openmoko Inc. ever promised that the > contents of the rootfs for the phone that they sell will be determined by > some sort of community consensus. > > If I remember correctly, they only promised to provide an open software > platform upon which *you* can create your own personalised rootfs. By > including both toolkits, they have not changed anything you experience with > respect to this promise.
And you'd end up arguing about the colour of the bike shed none stop. Some decisions openmoko just needs make to deliver us a phone. -- Steven Kurylo _______________________________________________ Openmoko community mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
