Andy Green wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Somebody in the thread at some point said: > | Andy Green wrote: > |> It used to be that our kernel packages followed our stable kernel git > daily. > |> > |> But the hash on that one tells it is stuck at Aug 23 patchlevel... > | > | Yet another reason why the openmoko autobuilder configuration should be > | documented and published somewhere. > | > | As an example, the person in charge of the openmoko autobuilder should > | publish the same information as can be found on > | http://downloads.freesmartphone.org and make the web server show the > | *actual* conf files used, like in > | http://downloads.freesmartphone.org/fso-testing/conf/ ... > > Yes, they (whoever they are) have packages from 16th September, it > doesn't look like we broke the build since everywhere is different aged > package.
The fso-testing distro builds the version of the linux-openmoko kernel denotes as latest stable by the conf/distro/include/sane-srcrevs.inc file, which currently in OE git (not OM git) on the org.openembedded.dev branch says: SRCREV_pn-linux-openmoko ?= "ca19d156400f817960efe0d14680324b2ea34171" In OM git, that same file (in the org.openmoko.dev branch) says: SRCREV_pn-linux-openmoko ?= "a1e97c611253511ffc2d8c45e3e6d6894fa03fa3" which surprise surprise matches the ipk in http://downloads.openmoko.org/repository/testing/om-gta02/ I have no idea what determines which version is built for the feeds at http://downloads.openmoko.org/repository/unstable/om-gta02/ since there is no published build configuration on downloads.openmoko.org anywhere to be found. It's up the the person in charge of testing the linux-openmoko bitbake recipe to determine what the latest stable version in the feeds should be by updating that sane-srcrevs.inc file (after booting an image using that kernel of course). -- Rod _______________________________________________ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community