Andy Green wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Somebody in the thread at some point said: > |> That may be, but despite that I need a daily package for kernel I > |> can point people to. Actually blocking current stable kernel from > |> users by not packaging it, which seems to be the case, is > |> completely backwards. > | > | That may be the case, and you defintely should be able to point > | experienced alpha testers to such isolated packages for testing, but > | you don't want inexperienced Joe Random User permanently setting > | their opkg feeds to a such a directory, so you don't really want it > | as part of the official feeds ... -- Rod > > Uh... yes in fact I do want it as part of an official feed.
I expect you want it as part of the unstable feed, not the testing feed. I can fully agree with that. People who use the unstable feed are the people who know they are testing the integration and distro consistency. > Someone has taken time to make a stable / testing / and even "unstable" > branches of stuff, and you think it is right that our stable kernel git > HEAD is so radioactive it doesn't even belong in "testing" or "unstable"? No, it definitely belongs in unstable, but never in testing automatically. Someone has to make a conscious decision (and commitment to the community that it should work) to edit sane-srcrevs.inc to make something new appear in testing. > This is certainly something we need, the only question is where to put > it so people who want to update to it can routinely get it. Unstable feed is the appropriate place for kernel stable branch head. -- Rod _______________________________________________ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community