Hi Brian,

> After thinking it over, I guess I'm asking what exactly would the
> 'learning analytics' measure besides comparative view counts and
> popular sections of the recordings? To show true 'learning'
> analytics, wouldn't there have to be comparisons to student work &
> progress in their respective courses? (i.e. how are the recordings
> helping students learn, and how do they assist w/ an instructor's
> teaching goals.)

Right, this is the first step in a bigger process.  We share the vision
presented by the SOLAR folks [1] that analytics has to become
cross-tool; we need to include lcms, clicker, video conferencing,
adaptive testing, etc. etc. data in order to build something really
meaningful for instructors.  Especially because Matterhorn doesn't have
assessment information which is often used as for learning outcomes.

Right now we're looking to just sow the kernels of an analytics
component within Matterhorn, and grow it from there.  At the same time,
we're undergoing research to try and uncover some of the correlations
that might exist in viewing habits with self-reported learning goals &
outcomes.  We're also investigating building a set of more broad APIs
in order to tie Matterhorn data in with out LCMS data (Blackboard) in
order to build a system to predict student activity.  Here's and early
paper on some of the investigations [2].  Comments always welcome.

> Also, I wonder whether there are any ideas out there in how
> Matterhorn recordings can be integrated with an instructor's online
> assignments, which could then also be captured through analytics.
> This might be helpful in bringing to light just how course recordings
> are used alongside course work. (Also wonder if an the Annotations
> feature might overlap this, actually -
> http://opencast.jira.com/wiki/display/MH/Annotation).

We've got a prototype of integration with Blackboard going (UNL was
doing some of this too).  That would probably be our route.  I know
others (Cape Town in particular) are doing integration with Sakai as
well.  I hope we'll show off our LCMS integration in the fall.

With respect to annotations I have to admit I have some very specific
feelings on the topic.  Based on a prototype we piloted with lecture
capture I don't believe timeline annotations will be used by students.
Instead, a more free flowing note taking method is something they
want.  We halted our investigations here, but the last survey we ran
showed students were really interested in having built in note taking
facilities, and a second pilot showed that these notes tended to be
quite rich in semantics.  I think note-taking, as opposed to
annotations, would be an excellent predictor of student outcomes.
Building the right tool here will take alot of solid engineering though.

Regards,

Chris

[1] http://www.solaresearch.org/
[2]
http://www.cs.usask.ca/~cab938/TheWhoWhatWhenandWhyofLectureCapture.pdf

-- 
Christopher Brooks, BSc, MSc
ARIES Laboratory, University of Saskatchewan

Web: http://www.cs.usask.ca/~cab938
Phone: 1.306.966.1442
Mail: Advanced Research in Intelligent Educational Systems Laboratory
     Department of Computer Science
     University of Saskatchewan
     176 Thorvaldson Building
     110 Science Place
     Saskatoon, SK
     S7N 5C9
_______________________________________________
Community mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/community


To unsubscribe please email
[email protected]
_______________________________________________

Reply via email to