Chris et. al., On Feb 15, 2012, at 12:18 PM, Christopher Brooks wrote:
> With respect to annotations I have to admit I have some very specific > feelings on the topic. Based on a prototype we piloted with lecture > capture I don't believe timeline annotations will be used by students. > Instead, a more free flowing note taking method is something they > want. We halted our investigations here, but the last survey we ran > showed students were really interested in having built in note taking > facilities, and a second pilot showed that these notes tended to be > quite rich in semantics. I think note-taking, as opposed to > annotations, would be an excellent predictor of student outcomes. When you have the time, could you unpack the comments above further? Are your feelings regarding annotations vs. note-taking based solely on the prototype or do you have supporting research? if you have research, would you mind sharing? Am I correct to assume that you believe annotations and long form note taking could and should live side-by-side within Matterhorn? Thanks in advance, Andy ************* Entwine - Knowledge In Motion www.entwinemedia.com @entwinemedia on Twitter
_______________________________________________ Community mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/community To unsubscribe please email [email protected] _______________________________________________
