On Tuesday, October 22, 2002, at 03:04 AM, Mike T. wrote: > Yea, but having seen the original resolution vs. VGA, it seems a shame > not > to do it, especially if you beef up the VRAM for the thousands of > colors. > Absolutely beautiful. After using the Mystic for a while, the icons and > fonts seem "too large" on the original resolution. My opinion. > I wouldn't argue with that at all - in fact I agree whole-heartedly. But because there are some people who are absolutely scared of putting a soldering iron any where near their beloved CC, it's important not to put thejm off the Mystic conversion because of their phobia. A 512 x 384 Mystic is far better than a 512 x 384 CC!
Stuart -- Compact Macs is sponsored by <http://lowendmac.com/>. Support Low End Mac <http://lowendmac.com/lists/support.html> Compact Macs list info: <http://lowendmac.com/lists/compact.shtml> The FAQ: <http://macfaq.org/> --> AOL users, remove "mailto:"; Send list messages to: <mailto:compact.macs@;mail.maclaunch.com> To unsubscribe, email: <mailto:compact.macs-off@;mail.maclaunch.com> For digest mode, email: <mailto:compact.macs-digest@;mail.maclaunch.com> Subscription questions: <mailto:listmom@;lemlists.com> Archive:<http://www.mail-archive.com/compact.macs%40mail.maclaunch.com/> Using a Mac? Free email & more at Applelinks! http://www.applelinks.com
