> I'm for option 3 as well, but what Kore suggests here is going to be a > pain in making the packages, as this doesn't follow any of the > guidelines that we have. We should so something about the names of > those script components though, like Tobias suggests.
Well, that is the question. Is it doable? If not there is no point voting on it :) If it is doable I suggest that we name the packages Scripts. E.g - DatabaseSchemaScripts - PersistentObjectScripts Cheers, Frederik -- Components mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ez.no/mailman/listinfo/components
