Frederik Holljen wrote: >> I'm for option 3 as well, but what Kore suggests here is going to be a >> pain in making the packages, as this doesn't follow any of the >> guidelines that we have. We should so something about the names of >> those script components though, like Tobias suggests. > > Well, that is the question. Is it doable? If not there is no point voting on > it :) If it is doable I suggest that we name the packages Scripts. E.g > - DatabaseSchemaScripts > - PersistentObjectScripts
Are there many scripts for each component? I just thought there is only one for DatabaseSchema to load and save schemas. If there is only one script per component then I don't see the need to create a new component to wrap around that script. -- Alexandru Stanoi eZ Components System Developer eZ Systems | http://ez.no -- Components mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ez.no/mailman/listinfo/components
