On Mon, 23 Jul 2007, Frederik Holljen wrote: > On Mon, 23 Jul 2007 09:22:06 +0200, Derick Rethans wrote: > > > I'm for option 3 as well, but what Kore suggests here is going to be a > > pain in making the packages, as this doesn't follow any of the > > guidelines that we have. We should so something about the names of > > those script components though, like Tobias suggests. > > Well, that is the question. Is it doable?
It's doable if we have them as a seperate component, just like PersistentObjectDatabaseSchema is. It's not doable to create new components from just a scripts directory unless we rewrite the package generator. > If not there is no point voting on > it :) If it is doable I suggest that we name the packages Scripts. E.g > - DatabaseSchemaScripts > - PersistentObjectScripts Yes, that sounds nice. regards, Derick -- Components mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ez.no/mailman/listinfo/components
