>In other words UCT works well when evaluation/playouts is/are strong. I >believe >there are still improvements possible to the UCT algorithm as shown by the >recent papers by Mogo and Crazystone authors, but what really will make a >difference is in the quality in the playouts.
Sylvain said that good moves in the playouts do not always improve the performance of UCT. What do you think about this claim? -- Yamato _______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
