I just looked at 133684.  ego110_allfirst took all the way until move 18 to
play a move above the 2nd line.  In fact, in the 8 moves it made prior to
that, 5 were on the first line.  ErlyGo's random plays had only 2 on the 2st
line and 2 on the 2nd line.  It seems like a random strategy gives a better
opening strategy than what ego110_allfirst ends up with.

I've been wondering what was done to ego110 to make ego110_allfirst, but
have been unable to find out yet.  There's been lots of discussion lately on
what would make a good "all moves as first" bot with no final conclusions.
I know that my AMAF variant shares more in common with ego than Don's, and
Don's version.  My bot is better than ego and Don's is better than mine.

I've been toying around with time control lately (and failing to get it
right).  I can take down housebot-xxx-ucb and put up housebot-xxx-amaf if
that helps with testing of erlygo.  (housebot-xxx-shuff is needed for my
timing test since it seems to stress the time usage policy more than my
other variants)

On 9/24/07, Don Dailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Did you look at the games?
>
> I looked at game 133580.sgf and your program was clearly lost playing
> the black pieces,  however the game record says that your opponent
> resigned in a dead won position.
>
> In fact, there were not moves left to play other than filling eyes.
>
>
> - - Don
>
>
>
> Urban Hafner wrote:
> > Hej all,
> >
> > I'm wondering if anybody knows how ego110_allfirst on CGOS works. The
> > name seems to suggest that it does random playouts and uses the
> > all-moves-as-first heuristic. Is this correct? And if so, how many
> > playouts does it do per move?
> >
> > I'm asking because I started developing my own bot. Right now the only
> > thing it does is play legal moves that aren't eyes of the bots color
> > (according to libegos definition, as that's what the bot is/will be
> > based on). The strange thing is that in the 9 games against
> > ego110_allfirst it was able to win 5 [1]. This seems really strange to
> > me. I would have guessed that even a small number of playouts would be
> > enough to beat a random bot like this consistently.
> >
> > Urban
> >
> > [1] http://cgos.boardspace.net/9x9/cross/ErlyGo-0.0.1.html
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> computer-go mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iD8DBQFG98SaDsOllbwnSikRAv2YAJ4kuoWB6vgkP470UFJE0dODADhZYACfbbmi
> P1zf3FSa5Z3Wda+Tj+kWo5E=
> =3oBL
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> _______________________________________________
> computer-go mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
>
_______________________________________________
computer-go mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/

Reply via email to