> Hi Issac, > You should be more in the range of +200-300 ELO, at least with pattern > based > playouts. > > Sylvain
Isaac. They are not pattern based playouts, but as I said uniformly random. I reckon the effect of RAVE is less with these? "How many playouts per second do you get with each version?" Actually, to make comparable tests with both versions, the version "without RAVE" just sets the coefficient of RAVE in the UCT-RAVE value calculation to zero. I get about 41k games/s on 9x9 (using 2 cores, about 20k/s/core). The playouts are fairly optimized but the tree search isn't at all yet, so there is still some potential. -- Jetzt 1 Monat kostenlos! GMX FreeDSL - Telefonanschluss + DSL für nur 17,95 Euro/mtl.!* http://dsl.gmx.de/?ac=OM.AD.PD003K11308T4569a _______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
