Willemien: <[email protected]>: >What happened exactly? > >a superko violation which was legal under Japanese rules ?
Yes. Jpanese rules inhibit just a simple ko. If a move is not a ko but a superko move, that move is legal under Japanese rules. >It sounds like a contradiction. >(if it is legal it is no violation and if it is a violation it is not legal) The opponent played not a ko but a superko move and CS denied the move. >Are the games published? Soon. Hideki >On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 8:57 AM, Stefan Kaitschick ><[email protected]> wrote: >>> Crazy Stone (CS) lost the first game due to a wrong ko setting. The >>> opponent of CS played a superko violation which was legal under Japanese >>> rules, and CS lost the game by a faul. >> >> The most devastating indictment against japanese rules I've seen so far. >> >> Stefan >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> computer-go mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/ >> >_______________________________________________ >computer-go mailing list >[email protected] >http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/ -- [email protected] (Kato) _______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list [email protected] http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
