I guess your right.
It's just that the "innocent" side losing on the spot rubs it in.
Accepting any move surely has to be a "bot vs.bot" mode.
Against a human opponent the bot can't very well accept suicide or immediate
ko takeback.
Stefan
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Boon" <[email protected]>
To: "computer-go" <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, November 30, 2009 9:26 PM
Subject: Re: [computer-go] KCC won the 3rd UEC Cup
Well, I suppose this is a lesson that every computer-Go programmer
learns one day or another: always have a way to accept any move, no
matter whether your bot thinks it's legal or not.
I don't see how this is an indictment, the rules are what they are.
For every player. It's not as if this was a little-known issue with
Japanese rules.
Mark
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 10:57 PM, Stefan Kaitschick
<[email protected]> wrote:
Crazy Stone (CS) lost the first game due to a wrong ko setting. The
opponent of CS played a superko violation which was legal under Japanese
rules, and CS lost the game by a faul.
The most devastating indictment against japanese rules I've seen so far.
Stefan
_______________________________________________
computer-go mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
_______________________________________________
computer-go mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
_______________________________________________
computer-go mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
