I thought that any layers beyond 3 were irrelevant. Probably I'm subsuming your nn into what I learned about nn's and didn't read anything carefully enough.
Can you help correct me? s. On Dec 23, 2014 6:47 AM, "Aja Huang" <ajahu...@google.com> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 12:38 PM, David Silver <davidstarsil...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> we'll evaluate against Fuego 1.1 and post the results. >> > > I quickly tested our 12-layer CNN against Fuego 1.1 with 5 secs and 10 > secs per move, 2 threads. The hardware is Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2687W 0 > @ 3.10GHz. > > 5 secs per move 12-layer CNN scored 55.8% ±5.4 > 10 secs per move 12-layer CNN scored 32.9% ±3.8 > > Fuego1.1 is clearly much weaker than the latest svn release. And > interestingly, the network is actually as strong as Fuego 1.1 with 5 secs > per move. > > Since Clark and Storkey's CNN scored 12% against Fuego 1.1 running on a > weaker hardware, our best CNN is about 220 to 310 Elo stronger which is > consistent to the results against GnuGo. > > Regards, > Aja > > > _______________________________________________ > Computer-go mailing list > Computer-go@computer-go.org > http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go >
_______________________________________________ Computer-go mailing list Computer-go@computer-go.org http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
